Tuesday, April 28, 2015

Mona J. Barnes - Journal Article Analysis  I don't know why it does not do the header and separate the pages.  Sorry


 

 
 

 

Grunge, Riot Grrrl and the Forgetting of Women in Popular Culture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mona J. Barnes

 

 

 

 

 
 

Humanities 240 –H1WW-W15
Instructor Jenifer Garey
April 25, 20

 

 

Grunge, Riot Grrrl and the Forgetting of Women in Popular Culture

My Analyzation

 

            Since the dawn of what is termed “grunge” music in the 1990’s along with the emergence and success of the group Nirvana, women who contributed to this scene have been pushed aside.  Grunge is a type of dark fusion of punk and metal music.  It came out of Seattle on the Sub Pop label in the late 1980’s and into the 90’s. There were several female bands that contributed to this movement.  Musicians in the grunge scene, of which many were males, had expressed an antisexist viewpoint in their music and in the grunge scene as a whole.  Riot Grrrl is a feminist punk movement that also came from the West coast in the 1990’s.  Female bands under this genre for example were Hole, Babes in Toyland, Courtney Love Band, and Dickless, to name a few of the more well known.  These bands were actually grunge music but the writer believes that these female bands and performers were put under the more "punk rock" label of Riot Grrrls so that the grunge field could be attributed to a male music genre.

            This journal paper came about from interviews with fans of grunge from Australia.  The response ratio for the interviews was 2/3 to 1/3 male to female.  They were randomly chosen by responding to fliers, underground newspapers, and music websites.  The interviewers asked questions about what the interviewees remembered about that time, and what the impact of grunge music was for them.  Even though there were a significant number of females who took on important roles in this movement, no one really remembers them like their male counterparts.  On the ten year anniversary of Kurt Cobain's death, it seemed that even the media, when discussing this era in music, forgot about or minimized the contributions that the female bands and performers made to this genre of music. 

            When discussing rock and roll, men also dominate, even though there have been great female contributors. This seems more widely accepted since rock music has always been considered a “male” genre of sex, drugs, and, well…you know the rest.

            In grunge music, the whole message was about gender equality and disappointment  life for the average angsty teenager at the the time, with Courtney Love being one of the most well-known grunge female performers. She was condemned for her rejection of how genders were perceived and stereotyped; even though the whole movement was about that and other things I mentioned earlier.  When the men were doing it, it was awesome. After the grunge scene waned and without the likes of  Eddie Vedder and Kurt Cobain, at least in a major market sense, the women of grunge music were chastised or shunned for this very genderless message.  According to the journal report (Strong, 2011. pg. 399) these women have been either forgotten or relabeled as “Riot Girrrls”.  This relabeling allows the threat posed to patriarchal relations to be compartmentalized and contained, while the “grunge” label is reinscribed as a form of “masculine” rock”.

            Why is this done to women and what causes their invisibility?  Throughout history, women’s contributions have either been rarely mentioned or left off of the records altogether.  This happens in all societies, regardless of geographic location.  Many say it may be because women were not the ones “keeping the record” of such events.  Others think that women didn’t protect their contributions like historians did for men.  Even in more modern times where there is documentation of such events of women, they are forgotten about just because they were female.  Most music done by women is labeled pop music, because surely females cannot be taken as serious contributors to real music.  If they ARE in serious bands, it is normal for society to view them as “eye-candy” and not real musicians. 

            When it comes to the music media, most of the press is run by men; excluding women or women’s contributions and expressing information from and to a male perspective.  One of the reasons this lack of credibility is brought about is the fact that not as many women write their own music and lyrics. They are not considered “real” musicians and are not controlling their own music and destiny. Therefore, they don’t really count and are often diminished until forgotten or just plain ignored altogether.  Males identified grunge as a masculine movement that depicted the rage that young boys and men were trying to express with how things were. Most girls at the time, in society, were not into grunge music like men were so that added to the masculine media love.  According to the journal report (2011, Strong, 411-412) one respondent’s answer about listening to any women of grunge, he responded, “Hole, Courtney Love is just a dirty rock slut” (laughs).

            Every time a woman or several women contribute in a big way to music or anything else, it is like it is a new thing for women.  No one adds to the history of these events all along that women took part in, no one adds to the history, because the history was forgotten.

            I agree that most of what Ms. Strong is saying is absolutely true.  However, in the past, and I mean long ago past, women were not allowed to have controlling interest or even opinions about what was going on in society.  It used to be that most of the well-educated were only men and it was “their department” to take care of such things.  Once women came into their own, they were then, I believe, contributors from behind the scenes.  Their discussions behind closed doors with their families afforded them more of an opportunity to offer or express an opinion.  If the man thought it a good idea, it was expressed as his own in most cases. 

            Society as a whole has socialized women for years of what their role is and what the male’s role is and only within the last few generations have we, as a society, started to truly recognize and acknowledge in a public format, what women are doing and contributing to their communities and on the world stage.  I also think that no matter what women do in any capacity or any field, they will always be diminished in the eyes of the world.  Is it due to how we socialize boys as well as the girls? Girls need to be empowered and boys need to know that even though they aren’t allowed to fight with girls because they may be stronger; girls can be on equal footing. 

            There is a very long way to go.  Our society is not ready, even though our girls are.

 


 

References

Strong, Catherine (2011, April. Grunge, Riot Grrrl and the Forgetting of Women in Popular

            Culture, Journal of Popular Culture, Volume 44 (2) 398-416.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Saturday, April 25, 2015

My Weekly Analysis #3

Mona J. Barnes  Written Analysis #3

            In relation to the phenomenon of Facebook, the theory that is applicable and that I found most interesting was the thought that spending time on Facebook may be detrimental to our us and our society, our intellect and ability to think of things on a deeper level.  This is untrue.
            Facebook serves as a comfortable and fun place to fall after a long hard day of work, whether it is in a physical or mental capacity.  It gives us all a chance to glimpse who our the villains and heroes of the day.  Time is of the essence in these times and Facebook can give a snapshot of things happening in our environment.  It is just a snapshot though, and not the complete story.  In paraphrasing an article in our Profiles of Popular Culture textbook, (Browne, 2005), we as a society should not be celebrating heroes in the present but in a historical context.  The true heroes of today are those that do something helpful for someone and go on about their way, without a big announcement or expectation of reward.
            I think that viewers see who receives accolades and who receives ridicule.  This sheds light on what is perceived as good or bad behavior in our current times.  It is a snapshot of our current culture’s morals and beliefs on average.

            Facebook shares many videos and stories about average people doing kind and helpful things.  I disagree with the reading in that there could be new heroes for us to herald if someone cured Cancer or eradicated ALS, Parkinson’s disease or in the case of my Father who lives with us, Alzheimer’s.  Modern day heroes can exist today and would still be considered heroes historically.       The insight that I have gained is that who is a hero to one is not to others.  When I get on Facebook, I see many heroes and many people that make me embarrassed to be a human being. 

Saturday, April 18, 2015

Written Analysis 2

      















Written Analysis 2

Mona J. Barnes

Popular Culture

Instructor Jenifer Garey

April 16, 2015






















            My popular culture topic is Facebook.  With regard to the concept of ritual or ritualistic
actions, I am amazed at how Facebook has become a part of many people’s morning and nighttime rituals.  Facebook is one of the first things most young folks and some older ones, check first thing in the morning.  They check it while they are having their morning coffee or just when they wake up to see what they have missed from the night before or to see if anyone has commented on what they themselves may have posted from the night before.  This brings me to the other side of the ritual.  I find that in my own personal usage of the application that many more people are on at night.  They are posting about what they did all day or responding to other people’s postings.  Often there is chatter going back and forth as if it were a chat room as opposed to just a “wall” to post things to. 
            My theory is, that overall, people really DO need people.  We are always looking for people to connect with.  Humans have a need to connect with others.  Even people who are introverts appear to be more communicative through the veil of Facebook.  People can connect in different ways on Facebook.  It does not have to be verbally but could be through interest pages, or Facebook videos and postings like the ALS challenge that was so big last summer.  It unites people or at least gives them a place to vent or just browse and not feel so alone.  It also gives people a chance to review, remember, and share their past with people that they have been out of touch with. As they age, these forgotten or disconnected people from their past can be reached out to, found, and even perhaps reconnect after years of being away from each other.
            I think it is a valuable tool if used properly.  On the dark side of things, as we have seen in the news many a time, it can be used to do harm.  It is often used for bullying when it comes to school age children or as a defense mechanism to call out the bullies so that they don’t get to remain hidden behind the scenes playing dirty.  I think it empowers bullies but also empowers the person being bullied because they can turn it around on those who are being nasty and expose them. 
            I have realized that some social medias are just so important for people.  Everyone needs a place to belong or a soft place to fall at the end of the day, and if they do not have a significant other or a close family, they can create, find, or reconnect with one on Facebook. 

            

Sunday, April 12, 2015

Icon Analysis

My three icons are the Hollywood Sign, the icon for Google, and McDonalds

I picked the Hollywood sign because it has been an icon in both real life as well as in television, and movies.  It has been around for a very long time and to some represents and is a symbol of their hopes and dreams.  I have seen it myself and I find it to be a bit "cool" to say that I saw it.  It is a powerful symbol and brings forth memories, passions, and inspires hope to many "wanna be" actors and actresses.  It is one of the symbols that is strictly American.  You are not going to go to any other country and see it.  It looks better in pictures but it does tend to stir some pride when you see it.  Hollywood itself, specifically Hollywood Blvd, it is a pit!

Google icon for me is the world at my fingertips.  It is known worldwide by anyone who may have or do use a computer.  Even those who still use Internet Explorer, know what Google is.  Not only do people use it for research, they use it for images, and Google maps and Google earth as well.

As for me, I use it because I am an innately curious person and anything and everything that may pop into my head, I can just Google for the information I need.  I always have said to my children and others that knowledge is power, and now I can get instant gratification to anything I want to know.  I LOVE GOOGLE.

Last but not least is the golden arches of McDonalds!  Who does NOT recognize those arches?  Even in other countries McDonalds is recognized.  They are everywhere.  I have never met anyone either here in the United States, nor out of the country that did not know what or about McDonalds.

Those arches symbolize a part of American history for many generations.  Even today, with everyone eating more healthy, McDonalds is usually always busy.  All these things I have spoken on are and will be a large part of our history.




Myth Analysis - Romance










Myth Analysis on Romance
Mona J. Barnes
Popular Culture
Instructor Jenifer Garey
April 12, 2015










            My myth is about romance.  The myth of romance in days of old to current times has certainly changed.  In earlier times, when a guy walked you home or carried your books, it was sweet and innocent and a way for a guy to show a gal he was interested.  If he was very bold, he may even try to put his arm around you in a movie.  Now fast forward to today, there is groping, partial nudity, people walking right up to each other and kissing them just for notoriety or shock value; quite a difference.
             There are many types of myths; some based on truth to some extent, and some based on tales.  When I was in Scotland, my honey and I took a ride on Loch Ness and heard stories about the professed but fake monster.  Currently there are still people who hold onto this belief and still search the Loch for such a creature.  There are myths regarding religion, as some people believe that Jesus really turned Lot’s wife into a pillar of salt, some others believe it was a parable to make a point.  Some atheists’ believe that the whole story of God and Jesus is a myth.  Others believe that Scientology is a myth but many who are considered educated and intelligent believe that it is real and seek out this “religion” as their own.  I think the more “bigger than life” the story is, the easier chance it has in becoming a myth.  Myths are everywhere and true or not, have captured our imaginations and/or hearts throughout time.
            I am currently watching on TV the Starz channel, a series based on books by Diana Gabaldon, titled Outlander.    I have read all of the books in this series over and over in the past years and I find it to be the epitome of romance, as I perceive it to be.  The myth that romance is all stars and unicorns and everything is always wonderful is not true romance to me.  However, many stories and movies portray that as a fact.  I believe that this is a disservice to our youth as well as us to believe that a romance is like the Cinderella story. 
Many myths are used as fairytales with heroes and Gods and good and evil.  However, when young people see these things when it is in regard to romance, they believe these things to be real and put these misconceptions on any potential mates that come along. 
            Micheal Novak (2014) writes, “Westerners have come to think that the central fire of human happiness is romantic love, love forever and ever (love “happily ever after”).  Imagination ends with the romantic couple walking hand in hand across the fields toward the sunlight.  Many people spend their entire lives looking for such love, wanting to feel such love, wondering, when they are first attracted to another, if that’s what they’re now feeling.  Above all, most people love being in love, love the feeling of loving, love even the mad passion of being in love.
            Now obviously, there are flowers, sunshine, and uncontrollable flutters when it comes to romance in the beginning.  However, the myth of the happily ever after does not include how there are so many obstacles along the way.  There are changes that couple go through.  I don’t mean the metamorphosis like Cinderella changing from a house grunt to a princess through the meeting of a rich and wonderful partner.  I am talking about realities of how sweet it is in the beginning, the process of setting up house, the introduction of babies and the hardships and tests that come along with living a long happily married life. 
            I always told my daughters that you may always love the person you are with but you darn sure don’t like them all of the time!  I have been married since I was seventeen (17) years old and am now soon to be fifty-four (54).  My hubby and I have been through many changes in our thirty-six (36) years together and not all of them have been glitter and rainbows.  The person you fell in love with at a young age may become a completely different person through the years and you may too.  It is important to change together and go through the hard times as well as the good.  I think the myth of romance, while wonderful, needs the added ingredient of reality versus fiction.  Too many people think that romance is like it is in the books and movies and then when it isn’t they assume they are with the wrong person and give up. 
            Often times, there is no one rushing in to save the day, they don’t have a lot of money just laying around to fix anything that needs fixed and they get mad at each other and have opposing viewpoints on things that maybe were not important to you at twenty but at thirty have become very important.  I don’t want to dispel the myth of romance, as it is there and wonderful, just not always in the form that is presented in the media and stories. 
            To get to the story I mentioned earlier, a woman travels back in time inadvertently and is forced to marry another man even though in current times she is already married.  There is no romance at the beginning other than a mutual attraction and the circumstances are far from romantic as to how they get together.  The story, like the Star Wars reference made in the class notes regarding Joseph Campbell’s monomyth components, has a story of how the main character is initially separated from a world she has known and a husband she is just getting to know again due to the war having separated them.  She is initiated into life in the 1700’s in the Scottish Highlands, and at one point during a famous battle that basically ended the clan ruling in the Highlands, she was sent back to here own time again to face a husband who thinks she left him on purpose and to whom she has to tell she is pregnant. 
            I believe that romance is still and will always be alive but in stories, especially fairy tales, although striving for magic, the writers have set up an impossible act to follow when it comes to real life.  I think the dichotomy for those kids who read those things and then see such fighting and horror in their homes must certainly be scarred for life at the contrast.   For escapism, I adore these movies and stories but that is never stressed to anyone, that they are stories; based on wishes and hopes.  Those are wonderful things but they send out a message that is untrue and make it too easy for people to give up on when it doesn’t turn out the way they think it should, like the movies and books and love songs.
           

















References


Balnicke,J., Free, W., Kennard, D. (1987). Monomyth. Documentary Movie.
            United States.

Gabaldon, Diana   (1991) Outlander. New York, NY: Delacorte Book

Novak, Michael (February 14, 2011): The Myth of Romantic Love retrieved from
            www.firstthings.com/web-exlcusives/2011/02